I’ve read a lot of arguments for and against abortion, but never have I read that there is a statistical link between Roe vs. Wade and a twenty-year drop in crime rates. Pretty mind-blowing, if you ask me…
I’ve read a lot of arguments for and against abortion, but never have I read that there is a statistical link between Roe vs. Wade and a twenty-year drop in crime rates. Pretty mind-blowing, if you ask me…
Brittanie
July 13, 2005 — 5:35 pm
It’s bullshit. Several statisticians have refuted this argument. I’m still pro-rights, though.
Max
July 14, 2005 — 12:33 am
I’m dubious, too–but I was intrigued enough to buy Freakonomics anyway.
Tricia
July 14, 2005 — 3:20 am
As I think was stated in the article, a statistical link does not necessarily equal causality. Interesting theory, all the same.
While this particular theory might be upsetting to many, it could be an arguement for more preventative social programs. For some reason taxpayers are always happy to fight crime and finance prisons, but are often unwilling to pay for social programs to benefit young children and disadvantaged mothers.
Kris
July 14, 2005 — 5:02 pm
Did you just get it, Max, or have you already read it? I’m wondering if it’s interesting enough to get a copy here…
Max
July 15, 2005 — 2:08 am
I just got it…I think it will be the first post-Harry Potter 6 read, because I’m finishing up Malcolm Gladwell’s “Blink” (which is excellent) right now.
Niffler
July 15, 2005 — 3:10 am
Psych 101 (or in my case, 100): Correlation does not necessarily equal causation. I’d still be interested to read it, however like Max said, AFTER Harry Potter 6. I’m currently re-reading OotP for the 2000th time. So excited for Saturday!